CUBE Knowledge Hub

CUBE Framework
Version 0.8 (BETA)
© 2024 Tenosis AB

Establishing a practice

4.4 Practical Examples

Situation

Charlie is a Chief Operations Officer and is responsible for the daily operations and delivery, as well as the development of the daily operations. During the last year, several larger improvement initiatives has been performed with less than satisfactory outcome. Delays, poor quality outputs and unclear decision making. It is a frustration situation for everyone as expectations are high, and the poor track record is affecting the organisation’s ability to keep up with competitors.

The management team has identified and prioritised to decided to strengthen the organisations project management capability to ensure better conditions for development initiatives. Charlie is tasked with establishing this practice and get it up and operational quickly.

Where do Charlie begin? And how shall Charlie ensure that the practice establishment does not become another failed project?

By applying the CUBE® framework Core Theory and the Asset Lifecycle Process, Charlie can ensure that all the conditions are in place for a successful establishment of a project management practice in a systematical way.

This can reduce the time of getting the practice up and running effectively. Which in turn reduces the risk of wasting time and resources on a half-implemented solution.

In this scenario, the identification of opportunities and prioritisation is already performed by the management team.

Scenario

1. Design: Identify key stakeholders

The first thing Charlie does is identify all parties that are affected and affects the project management practice. To do this, Charlie interviews key stakeholders:

  • Management team peers
  • Operations managers
  • Selected operations staff (that will be affected by the projects outcomes)
  • Finance
  • HR
  • IT

..and other departments and roles that will regularly be affected by the new practice.

By doing this, Charlie identified their needs, limiting factors as well as expectations on the project management practice.

2. Design: Assess impact on current asset structure

After the interviews, Charlie reviews the assets:

  • strategy

  • values

  • top-level governance

  • financial model and budget process

  • Related processes

.. and other documents that sets the frames that the project management practice needs to align with.

This ensures that the design will be aligned and integrated with already existing assets and ways of working. 

Charlie also identified a few current assets that needs to be adjusted to allow for better integration of the project management practice.

Read more…

3. Design: Design and draft the asset

Charlie now proceeds to design the frames for how the practice should operate. 

Charlie does this by designing and drafting, the following documents:

  • Development standard, containing:

    • Purpose of the practice

    • Roles and responsibilities

    • Project methodology and structures

    • Governance forums and coordination forums

  • Development process

    • Which roles should perform what action in which order

..and any other relevant documents that are required by the organisation.

Charlie now has a defined and ready to be decided upon suggestion for the new practice.

4. Design: Draft plans for communication and implementation

But before Charlie request decision on the steering documents, Charlie creates a communication and implementation plan and anchors this with the key managers that will be affected by the implementation.

This ensures that the plan is realistic and also creates buy in from the affected organisations.

Read more…

5. Design: Decide to commit

Charlie presents the steering documents and the plans to communicate and implement to the management team and requests a decision to start.

The management team discusses and gives their approval for Charlie to proceed.

Charlie now has the approval to publish the steering documents and start executing the plans.

Read more…

6. Communicate

Charlie creates all the communication material and involves the key leaders in the process. Charlie then proceeds to formally publish the steering documents (standard and process) and start executing the communication plan accordingly.

During the communication, Charlie ensures to work closely with the key leaders and manage any feedback or objections that arises.

Read more…

7. Implement: Execute the implementation plan

Once communicated, Charlie proceeds to execute the implementation plan, ensuring to:

  • Continually engage leaders
  • Manage deviations and issues
  • Manage risks
  • Communicate progress regularly
  • Perform and follow-up training for relevant individuals

..and other activities in the implementation plan.

Charlie knows that this is the most intense phase where doubts and issues arises. But since Charlie has prepared, planed and involved key stakeholders, Charlie gets active support in ensuring to push through the challenges that arises. 

Read more…

8. Evaluate: Confirming how it went

After the implementation is performed, Charlie assess the outcome of the change. Charlie aggregates:

  • Changes to performance
  • Incidents and deviations
  • Operational questions and challenges
  • Conflicts or gaps with related assets

..and any other information or observations that Charlie can find.

Charlie then reviews everything and summarizes recommendations for improvements.

The conclusion is that it has given the organisation a positive boost, but there are additional actions needed to get the practice to operate according to expectations. 

Given this positive outcome, Charlie suggests to continue improve the practice (instead of decommissioning it, which can be an option if it failed completely). 

Read more…

9. Improve: Making the asset even better

Charlie together with the key stakeholders prioritises the identified opportunities for improvement and starts the work of designing and planning the implementation of the improvements.

With the asset established and the practice operational, Charlie continues to maintain and improve the asset on a regular basis over many years to come. Making sure that the asset is aligned with company direction and operates optimally based on the organisations changing needs and context.

Conclusion

In this scenario, Charlie acts as the project manager for the implementation of the practice but amore likely scenario would be that Charlie is the sponsor, and assigns an experienced individual that would lead the project.

The asset lifecycle process is overall not much different from any other lifecycle and project methodology. The key difference is that it adds activities that ensures the integration of the new asset with existing assets, reducing that the new practice performs poorly. Not because of itself, but because the related practices are not prepared and integrated with the new one, resulting in poor conditions to succeed.

By leaning on the CUBE® framework, the establishment of the project management practice was performed in such a way that the organisation and all key stakeholders where involved and supported the success of the implementation. By having a common understanding, language and approach for doing this, all parts of the organisation could effectively collaborate.

Next Step

Check our more practical examples or explore the Asset Library to find practical inspiration…